ArticlemSystems2025
Optimizing fungal DNA extraction and purification for Oxford Nanopore untargeted shotgun metagenomic sequencing from simulated hemoculture specimens.
Article in mSystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hidden Fungal DNA Structures May Shape Sequencing Outcomes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Quantitative interpretation models for targeted next-generation sequencing in lower respiratory tract infections: a multicenter prospective study.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Impact of DNA Extraction Strategies on Genomic and Bioinformatic Outcomes in Eight Selected Fungal Strains.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Basic Microbiome Analysis: Analytical Steps from Sampling to Sequencing.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Demonstrated role of sulfate-reducing bacterial consortia in anaerobic paracetamol biodegradation.Biodegradation · 2025Article
- Multi-platform metagenomic characterization of the microbial community during spontaneous cacao fermentation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-read metagenomics provides a promising alternative approach to fungal identification, circumventing methodological biases, associated with DNA amplification, which is a prerequisite for DNA barcoding/metabarcoding based on the primary fungal DNA barcode (Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region). However, DNA extraction for long-read sequencing-based fungal identification poses a significant challenge, as obtaining long and intact fungal DNA is imperative. Comparing different lysis methods showed that chemical lysis with CTAB/SDS generated DNA from pure fungal cultures with high yields (ranging from 11.20 ± 0.17 µg to 22.99 ± 2.22 µg depending on the species) while preserving integrity. Evaluating the efficacy of human DNA depletion protocols demonstrated an 88.73% reduction in human reads and a 99.53% increase in fungal reads compared to the untreated yeast-spiked human blood control. Evaluation of the developed DNA extraction protocol on simulated clinical hemocultures revealed that the obtained DNA sequences exceed 10 kb in length, enabling a highly efficient sequencing run with over 80% active pores. The quality of the DNA, as indicated by the 260/280 and 260/230 ratios obtained from NanoDrop spectrophotometer readings, exceeded 1.8 and 2.0, respectively. This demonstrated the great potential of the herein optimized protocol to extract high-quality fungal DNA from clinical specimens enabling long-read metagenomics sequencing. IMPORTANCE: A novel streamlined DNA extraction protocol was developed to efficiently isolate high molecular weight fungal DNA from hemoculture samples, which is crucial for long-read sequencing applications. By eliminating the need for labor-intensive and shear-force-inducing steps, such as liquid nitrogen grinding or bead beating, the protocol is more user-friendly and better suited for clinical laboratory settings. The automation of cleanup and extraction steps further shortens the overall turnaround time to under 6 hours. Although not specifically designed for ultra-long DNA extraction, this protocol effectively supports fungal identification through Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing. It yields high molecular weight DNA, resulting in longer sequence fragments that improve the number of fungal reads over human reads. Future improvements, including adaptive sampling technology, could further simplify the process by reducing the need for human DNA depletion, paving the way for more automated, bioinformatics-driven workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.