ReviewJournal of paediatrics and child health2025
Evaluating Primitive Reflexes in Early Childhood as a Potential Biomarker for Developmental Disabilities.
Review in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal metformin treatment in obese pregnant dams normalizes neonatal sensory-motor reflexes.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2026Article
- Relationship of the Persistent Primitive Reflexes to Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Autistic and Typically Developing Children.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Effects of a 6-Month Exercise Intervention on Primitive Reflexes in Children with Developmental Language Disorder-A Case for Multisensory and Sensorimotor Integration.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aim to understand better the significance of retained primitive reflexes (RPRs) and examine the effect of RPRs in children, adolescents, and adults, focusing on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other neurodevelopmental conditions, as well as examine a basis for future treatment alternatives. We included a history section to better recognise the way that the scientific and medical communities have studied and understood the importance of RPRs. We review findings indicating that aspects of these disorders are related to the presence of functional disconnectivities related to a cortical maturational effect on neuronal networks. Cortical maturational delay within specific networks may lead to enhanced growth and maturation in other networks, resulting in asynchronous development and inconsistency in functional skills. There has been reported an overconnectivity of short-range, more immature connections and an underconnectivity of long-range, more mature connectivities. We review the relationship between motor and cognitive impairments and RPRs. A crucial conclusion will be that inhibiting these RPRs is representative of treatment targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.