ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Factors influencing self-report adherence to treatment in a sample of patients with hypertension in the west Pomeranian Voivodeship of Poland.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: One of the major challenges in managing hypertension is non-adherence to treatment recommendations. This issue poses a significant barrier to effectively controlling blood pressure and preventing related cardiovascular complications. The main objective of this study was to demonstrate the level of adherence to therapeutic recommendations by hypertensive patients, and to determine how socio-demographic and medical variables affect adherence. Methods: The study was conducted among 205 patients with diagnosed hypertension hospitalized in the West Pomeranian Voivodeship. The study used a diagnostic survey method, a survey technique, and a self-administered questionnaire and the Adherence to Refills and Medication Scale. Results: The overall score for the ARMS questionnaire was 24.32, which is 2.03 points per question and indicates that adherence to therapeutic recommendations among the hypertensive patients surveyed was at a good level. Based on the collected data, it was shown that the older the age, the worse the adherence was. In addition, urban residents adhered to therapeutic recommendations less frequently than other respondents. Conclusion: Patients with diabetes were more likely to be non-compliant than patients without diabetes. And respondents with diagnosed CHF were more likely to adhere to recommendations than other respondents. Age, occupational activity and place of residence influenced adherence to treatment recommendations among hypertensive patients surveyed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.