Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196853›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

A determination of patient preferences for China online outpatient follow-up clinics by using discrete choice experiment: an exploratory study.

Nan Chen, Dan Bai, Jing Ning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nan ChenSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Dan BaiSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Jing NingSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Internet hospitals as a telehealth platform are rapidly growing in China both in quality and scale. This study aims to explore Chinese patients' preferences, trade-offs and willingness to pay for attributes of online outpatient follow-up clinics. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was designed to elicit respondents' stated preferences for six attributes. The online survey was conducted between November 2023 and December 2023, and mixed logit models were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 337 valid Chinese respondents were recruited. The results showed that an online outpatient follow-up clinic preferred by respondents could be described as low cost, provided by a tertiary Internet hospital, available same-day appointment, appointment with their own first diagnosing doctor, video appointment consultation, and payment by medical insurance. People with higher e-health literacy were more likely to accept an online outpatient follow-up appointment. Conclusion: Chinese respondents place a high value on waiting time for appointments, online payment methods, and continuity of online doctors. They were willing to pay more to avoid waiting a week for an online appointment. Our study provides valuable information for the telehealth policy-making and operation of Internet hospitals for healthcare sustainability.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorInternetOutpatientsPatient PreferenceTelemedicineAdultAppointments and SchedulesChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesdiscrete choice experimentinternet hospitalonline outpatient follow-up clinicstated preferencestelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40196853
PMCPMC11973272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.