ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
HTRecNet: a deep learning study for efficient and accurate diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pioneering efficient deep learning architectures for enhanced hepatocellular carcinoma prediction and clinical translation.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence and ensemble learning for hepatocellular carcinoma classification: State of the art, performance, and clinical implications.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Applications and challenges.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represent the primary liver cancer types. Traditional diagnostic techniques, reliant on radiologist interpretation, are both time-intensive and often inadequate for detecting the less prevalent CCA. There is an emergent need to explore automated diagnostic methods using deep learning to address these challenges. Methods: This study introduces HTRecNet, a novel deep learning framework for enhanced diagnostic precision and efficiency. The model incorporates sophisticated data augmentation strategies to optimize feature extraction, ensuring robust performance even with constrained sample sizes. A comprehensive dataset of 5,432 histopathological images was divided into 5,096 for training and validation, and 336 for external testing. Evaluation was conducted using five-fold cross-validation and external validation, applying metrics such as accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) against established clinical benchmarks. Results: The training and validation cohorts comprised 1,536 images of normal liver tissue, 3,380 of HCC, and 180 of CCA. HTRecNet showed exceptional efficacy, consistently achieving AUC values over 0.99 across all categories. In external testing, the model reached an accuracy of 0.97 and an MCC of 0.95, affirming its reliability in distinguishing between normal, HCC, and CCA tissues. Conclusion: HTRecNet markedly enhances the capability for early and accurate differentiation of HCC and CCA from normal liver tissues. Its high diagnostic accuracy and efficiency position it as an invaluable tool in clinical settings, potentially transforming liver cancer diagnostic protocols. This system offers substantial support for refining diagnostic workflows in healthcare environments focused on liver malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.