ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Design and evaluation of new user control devices for improved ergonomics in flexible robotic endoscopy.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The ergonomics of flexible endoscopes require improvement as the current design carries a high risk of musculoskeletal injury for endoscopists. Robotic systems offer a solution by separating the endoscope from the control handle, allowing a focus on ergonomics and usability. Despite the increasing interest in this field, little attention has been paid towards developing ergonomic human input devices. This study addresses two key questions: How can handheld control devices for flexible robotic endoscopy be designed to prioritize ergonomics and usability? And, how effective are these new devices in a simulated clinical environment? Methods: Addressing this gap, the study proposes two handheld input device models for controlling a flexible endoscope in four degrees of freedom (DOFs) and an endoscopic instrument in three DOFs. A two-stage evaluation was conducted with six endoscopists evaluating the physical ergonomics and a final clinical user evaluation with seven endoscopists using a virtual colonoscopy simulator with proportional velocity and position mapping. Results and discussion: Both models demonstrated clinical suitability, with the first model scoring 4.8 and the second model scoring 5.2 out of 6 in the final evaluation. In sum, the study presents two designs of ergonomic control devices for robotic colonoscopy, which have the potential to reduce endoscopy-related injuries. Furthermore, the proposed colonoscopy simulator is useful to evaluate the benefits of different mapping modes. This could help to optimize the design and control mechanism of future control devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.