ReviewRSC advances2025
Research progress of silicon-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries.
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymeric and Chelate Gel Precursors for Transition Metal Oxide and Silicon-Based Anodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Si-doped CsSrIRSC advances · 2026Review
- Enhanced lithium storage in silicon anodesRSC advances · 2026Article
- Nickel-catalyzed CNTs enhancing cycle performance of Si@C anodes.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Dynamic Evolution and Degradation of Silicon-Electrolyte Interfaces under Cycling via Chemical Potential-Controlled Molecular Dynamics.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Exploring the advances in 2D materials as a quest for energy storage electrode materials.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Review of Low-Temperature Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2026Review
- A Flame-Retardant Cyclophosphazene as an Electrolyte Component for Si-Graphite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, with the rapid development of fields such as portable electronic devices, electric vehicles, and energy storage systems, the performance requirements for lithium-ion batteries have been continuously rising. Among the numerous key components of lithium-ion batteries, the performance of the anode materials plays a crucial role, as it is directly related to core indicators such as the energy density, cycle life, and safety of the batteries. Among them, silicon-based anode materials have stood out among many anode materials by virtue of their extremely high theoretical specific capacity, becoming one of the hot research directions in the field of lithium-ion battery anode materials at present. However, silicon-based anode materials have problems such as severe volume expansion, poor electrical conductivity, low initial coulombic efficiency, and unstable solid electrolyte interphase during the charging and discharging process, which limit their wide application and urgently require the seeking of new solutions. This paper comprehensively and in-depth introduces the research progress of silicon-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries in recent years, focusing on the failure mechanisms and modification methods of silicon-based anodes, and provides effective solutions to the severe challenges faced in the commercialization process of silicon-based anodes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.