ArticleCancer innovation2025
A Survey of Clinical Practices for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Experts at Tertiary Hospitals in China From 2020 to 2021.
Article in Cancer innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elucidating the Mechanism of Oridonin in Treating Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in China. The rapid progress in systemic therapies has led to the approval of many therapeutic methods that have quickly changed clinical guidelines and practices. Because of the high heterogeneity of HCC, there are still some gaps between the guidelines and real-world clinical practice. The present study surveyed experts in China to investigate the current treatment concepts and clinical practice regarding HCC. Methods: A questionnaire survey on the treatment concepts and clinical practice of HCC was administered to 310 experts with senior professional titles in 2020 and 312 experts in 2021. The results were analyzed and compared. Results: For treating patients with resectable HCC, 28% of hepatobiliary surgeons indicated neoadjuvant therapy, and 7% chose systemic therapy ± locoregional therapy as 1 L therapy in 2021 compared with 20% and 1% in 2020. More experts chose adjuvant treatment within 1 month in 2021 compared with 2020, and 6 months and 12 months were the leading choices for the duration of adjuvant treatment. In 2021, 79% of surgeons and 19% of interventionalists were willing to conduct downstaging/conversion therapy for patients with potentially resectable HCC, and 78% chose tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) + immunotherapy (IO) + locoregional therapy for cases in which R0 resection could not be achieved. For completely unresectable HCC, more experts preferred TKI + IO-based therapy as 1 L therapy in 2021 compared with 2020 (78% vs. 55%). The proportion of experts who indicated TKI + IO-based therapy as 2 L therapy increased from 32% in 2020 to 40% in 2021. Conclusion: The survey results indicated that in 2021, compared with 2020, more experts opted to administer IO + TKI for the treatment of liver cancer, and more experts and patients were willing to participate in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.