ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Male and Female Mice Are Similarly Susceptible to Chronic Nondiscriminatory Social Defeat Stress Despite Differences in Attack Frequency from Aggressor.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rationale: Mood disorders are often precipitated by chronic stress and can result in an inability to adapt to the environment and increased vulnerability to challenging experiences. While diagnoses of mood disorders are diagnosed twice as frequently in women than in men, most preclinical chronic social defeat stress mouse models exclude females due to decreased aggression toward female intruders. Objectives: We previously reported that the chronic non-discriminatory social defeat stress (CNSDS) paradigm is effective in both sexes, allowing for comparisons between male and female mice. We aimed to improve the screening protocol to identify CD-1 aggressors for use in CNSDS and the method for determining susceptibility to CNSDS. Finally, we aimed to determine whether susceptibility to CNSDS correlated with impaired performance in a satiety-based outcome devaluation task. Methods: We analyzed CNSDS screening and social defeat sessions to determine appropriate parameters for selecting CD-1 aggressors and investigated aggressions toward male and female intruder mice. We also investigated CNSDS effects on a reward valuation task. Results: We observed that despite receiving fewer attacks, female mice are equally susceptible to CNSDS as males and that CNSDS abolished satiety-based outcome devaluation in susceptible male and female mice, but not in resilient male and female mice. Conclusions: These data suggest that CNSDS-defined susceptible and resilient phenotypes extend to reward behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.