ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A universal power law optimizes energy and representation fidelity in visual adaptation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory systems continuously adapt their responses based on the probability of encountering a given stimulus. In the mouse primary visual cortex (V1), the average population response is a power law of the prior probability of stimuli in the environment. For a given stimulus type (e.g., oriented gratings), the power law's exponent is invariant to changes in statistical environments, enabling predictions of average population responses to new environments. Here, we aim to provide a normative explanation for the power law behavior. We develop an efficient coding model where neurons adjust their firing rates through multi-objective optimization, hypothesizing that the neural population adapts to enhance stimulus detection and discrimination while reducing overall neural activity. We show that a power law that matches the one observed experimentally can emerge from our model. We interpret the exponent as reflecting a balance between energy efficiency and representational fidelity in adaptation. Furthermore, we account for the invariance of the power law's exponent across environmental changes by linking it to the dependence of tuning curve modulation on stimulus probability. Finally, we explain that variations in the exponent with different stimulus types (e.g., natural movies) result from changes in the minimal distances between neural representations, in agreement with experimental findings. We conclude that a universal power law of adaptation can be explained as a trade-off between representation fidelity and energy cost.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.