Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196572›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

A universal power law optimizes energy and representation fidelity in visual adaptation.

Matteo Mariani, S Amin Moosavi, Dario L Ringach, Mario Dipoppa

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matteo MarianiDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2923-6781
S Amin MoosaviDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8862-789X
Dario L RingachDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-334X
Mario DipoppaDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-4224

Funding

Thalamic constraints on cortical organizationR01EY034488 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2023 to 2025
$1.8M
Population codes and sensory discriminationR01NS116471 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2023 to 2024
$789k
Cortical adaptation in neural populationsR21EY035064 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2024 to 2025
$424k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034488NEI NIH HHS R21 EY035064NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory systems continuously adapt their responses based on the probability of encountering a given stimulus. In the mouse primary visual cortex (V1), the average population response is a power law of the prior probability of stimuli in the environment. For a given stimulus type (e.g., oriented gratings), the power law's exponent is invariant to changes in statistical environments, enabling predictions of average population responses to new environments. Here, we aim to provide a normative explanation for the power law behavior. We develop an efficient coding model where neurons adjust their firing rates through multi-objective optimization, hypothesizing that the neural population adapts to enhance stimulus detection and discrimination while reducing overall neural activity. We show that a power law that matches the one observed experimentally can emerge from our model. We interpret the exponent as reflecting a balance between energy efficiency and representational fidelity in adaptation. Furthermore, we account for the invariance of the power law's exponent across environmental changes by linking it to the dependence of tuning curve modulation on stimulus probability. Finally, we explain that variations in the exponent with different stimulus types (e.g., natural movies) result from changes in the minimal distances between neural representations, in agreement with experimental findings. We conclude that a universal power law of adaptation can be explained as a trade-off between representation fidelity and energy cost.

Identifiers

PMID40196572
PMCPMC11974702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.