Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196571›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Comparative analysis of nuclei isolation methods for brain single-nucleus RNA sequencing.

Holly N Kersey, Dominic J Acri, Luke C Dabin, Kelly Hartigan, Richard Mustaklem, Jung Hyun Park, Jungsu Kim

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Holly N KerseyMedical Neurosciences Graduate Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2168-6139
Dominic J AcriMedical Neurosciences Graduate Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Luke C DabinStark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kelly HartiganMedical Neurosciences Graduate Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Richard MustaklemStark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jung Hyun ParkStark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jungsu KimStark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6931-8581

Funding

The role of ABI3 in Alzheimers diseaseR01AG071281 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KIM, JUNGSU · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Molecular genetic analyses of transcriptional dysregulation in Alzheimers diseaseR01AG077829 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Jungsu Kim · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
Training Grant on Alzheimer's Disease and ADRD at Indiana UniversityT32AG071444 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI GARY E. LANDRETH, Bruce T Lamb · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
The role of ABI3 in Alzheimers diseaseRF1AG074543 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KIM, JUNGSU · 2021 to 2021
$2.3M
The role of ABI3 in Alzheimers diseaseR01AG074543 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KIM, JUNGSU · 2024 to 2025
$1.3M
Generation of Abi3 conditional knockout mouse modelR21AG072738 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KIM, JUNGSU · 2021 to 2021
$432k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071281NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074543NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077829NIA NIH HHS R21 AG072738NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG074543NIA NIH HHS T32 AG071444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) enables resolving cellular heterogeneity in complex tissues. snRNA-seq overcomes limitations of traditional single-cell RNA-seq by using nuclei instead of cells, allowing to utilize frozen tissues and difficult-to-isolate cell types. Although various nuclei isolation methods have been developed, systematic evaluations of their effects on nuclear integrity and subsequent data quality remain lacking, a critical gap with profound implications for the rigor and reproducibility. To address this, we compared three mechanistically distinct nuclei isolation strategies with brain tissues: a sucrose gradient centrifugation-based method, a spin column-based method, and a machine-assisted platform. All methods successfully captured diverse cell types but revealed considerable protocol-dependent differences in cell type proportions, transcriptional homogeneity, and the preservation of cell-type-specific and cell-state-specific markers. Moreover, isolation workflows differentially influenced contamination levels from ambient, mitochondrial, and ribosomal RNAs. Our findings establish nuclei isolation methodology as a critical experimental variable shaping snRNA-seq data quality and biological interpretation. MOTIVATION: Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) has become an essential tool for transcriptomic analysis of complex tissues. However, the quality and efficiency of data generation depend heavily on the method used for nuclear isolation. The existing isolation techniques vary in their ability to preserve nuclear integrity, minimize ambient RNA contamination, and optimize recovery rates. Despite these differences in quality, a systematic comparison of these methods, specifically for brain tissue, is lacking. This gap poses a challenge for researchers in choosing the most suitable approach for their particular experimental requirements. To address this critical issue, our study directly compared three nuclei isolation methods and evaluated their performance in terms of yield, purity, and downstream sequencing quality. By providing a comprehensive assessment, we aim to guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate isolation protocol for their snRNA-seq experiments, ensuring optimal results and advancing the study of complex brain tissues at the single-nucleus level.

Indexed as

ambient RNAcontaminationdata qualitynuclei isolationsnRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID40196571
PMCPMC11974938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.