ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
ConfuseNN: Interpreting convolutional neural network inferences in population genomics with data shuffling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become powerful tools for population genomic inference, yet understanding which genomic features drive their performance remains challenging. We introduce ConfuseNN, a method that systematically shuffles input haplotype matrices to disrupt specific population genetic features and evaluate their contribution to CNN performance. By sequentially removing signals from linkage disequilibrium, allele frequency, and other population genetic patterns in test data, we evaluate how each feature contributes to CNN performance. We applied ConfuseNN to three published CNNs for demographic history and selection inference, confirming the importance of specific data features and identifying limitations of network architecture and of simulated training and testing data design. ConfuseNN provides an accessible biologically motivated framework for interpreting CNN behavior across different tasks in population genetics, helping bridge the gap between powerful deep learning approaches and traditional population genetic theory.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.