Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196464›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025

Validation of a Machine-Learning Clinical Decision Aid for the Differential Diagnosis of Transient Loss of Consciousness.

Alistair Wardrope, Melloney Ferrar, Steve Goodacre, Daniel Habershon, Timothy J Heaton, Stephen J Howell, Markus Reuber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. 'BMJ open · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alistair WardropeDepartment of Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3614-6346
Melloney FerrarSyncope and Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Service, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4697-3154
Steve GoodacreDirectorate of Acute and Emergency Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0803-8444
Daniel HabershonSpecialised Cancer Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield, United Kingdom; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3692-1761
Timothy J HeatonDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-142X
Stephen J HowellDepartment of Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-9644
Markus ReuberDepartment of Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4104-6705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine-learning classifier based on patient and witness questionnaires to support differential diagnosis of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) at first presentation. Methods: We prospectively recruited patients newly presenting with TLOC to an emergency department, an acute medical unit, and a first seizure or syncope clinic. We invited participants to complete an online questionnaire, either at home or at time of initial assessment. Two expert raters determined the cause of participants' TLOC after 6-month follow-up. We used independent development and validation samples to train a random forest classifier to predict diagnosis from participants' questionnaire responses and validate classifier performance. We compared classifier performance against penalized linear regression and referrer diagnosis. Results: We included 178 participants in the final analysis, of whom 46 identified a witness able to complete an additional witness questionnaire. Given low witness recruitment, we developed a classifier based on patient answers only. A classifier trained on 9 items correctly identified 63 of 78 diagnoses (80.8%) (95% CI 70.0-88.5), an increase over the accuracy of initial assessing clinicians who were only able to diagnose 70.5% correctly. Within this, 96% (87.0%-99.4%) of those expertly rated as having syncope were correctly classified by the classifier (classifier sensitivity); 40% (20%-63.6%) of those expertly rated after follow-up as having either epilepsy or functional/dissociative seizures were similarly classified as being nonsyncope (classifier specificity). Discussion: A machine-learning classifier for differential diagnosis of TLOC has comparable performance in differentiating between 3 main causes of primary TLOC as the current standard of care but is insufficiently accurate in its current form to warrant incorporation into routine care. A system including information from witnesses might improve classification performance.

Identifiers

PMID40196464
PMCPMC11975300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.