Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196440›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Qualitative evaluation of two London Faith and Health Networks: lessons learnt from a model of an interface between health systems and minority communities.

Ana Zuriaga-Alvaro, Ben Kasstan-Dabush, Ella Johnson, Tracey Chantler, Leonora G Weil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Zuriaga-AlvaroThe NHSE Legacy and Health Equity Partnership, NHS England, London, England, UK.
Ben Kasstan-DabushThe Vaccine Centre, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9020-2954
Ella JohnsonThe NHSE Legacy and Health Equity Partnership, NHS England, London, England, UK.
Tracey ChantlerThe Vaccine Centre, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Leonora G WeilThe NHSE Legacy and Health Equity Partnership, NHS England, London, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-7155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ethnic and religious minorities in the UK had a higher risk of severe illness and mortality from COVID-19 in 2020-2021, yet were less likely to receive vaccinations. Two Faith Health Networks (FHNs) were established in London in 2022-2024 as a partnership approach to mitigate health inequalities among Muslim and Jewish Londoners through a health system-community collaboration. By evaluating the FHNs, this study aimed to examine: the organisational processes required for FHNs to serve as a model of interface between health systems and minority communities; the role these networks play in addressing public health inequalities; and implications for their future development and sustainability. Methods: A qualitative evaluation of the two FHNs was conducted using semi-structured interviews (n=19) with members of the 'London Jewish Health Partnership' and the 'London Muslim Health Network'. Participant clusters included public health professionals, healthcare workers, community representatives and local government workers. Results: The FHNs shared similar structures of leadership, but differed in core membership, which influenced their access to expertise and the activities developed. They were found to perform a key conduit role by integrating expertise from within the health system and faith communities to address the needs and expectations of underserved communities, with the ultimate goal of addressing health inequalities through the design of tailored campaigns and services. Emerging themes for developing an FHN model included enhancing their sustainability by determining funding allocation, strategic integration into health systems and identifying the appropriate geographical scope to sustain their impact. Further implications included recognition of intersectionality, addressing diverse needs within faith communities and trust-building approaches. Conclusion: This evaluation offers insights into developing partnership models between faith-based organisations and health sectors to foster relationships with underserved communities. These findings provide valuable considerations for teams navigating the priority of health equity and community engagement as part of our learning from the pandemic to support the development of FHNs across different faith communities, not just for vaccine uptake, but to support the broader health and well-being of communities more widely.

Indexed as

Community HealthPublic HealthQualitative ResearchTrustVaccination

Identifiers

PMID40196440
PMCPMC11973757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.