ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology
Primary Eosinophilic Panniculitis of the Greater Omentum in a Young Girl: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary (or idiopathic) panniculitis involving the intra-abdominal adipose tissue is rare, and its pathogenesis remains unknown. A case of primary eosinophilic panniculitis that involved the greater omentum of a girl is reported. Case Presentation: The patient, an 11-year-old girl, complained of dull periumbilical pain and nausea, and radiological examination showed a mass lesion in the abdomino-pelvic cavity. On laparoscopy, a plaque-like, flat mass was seen in the greater omentum, and laparoscopic omental resection was performed. On histopathological examination, the interlobular fibrous septa of omental adipose tissue were widened by inflammatory edema, prominent infiltration of eosinophils, and loose proliferation of myofibroblasts. Dense lymphocytic infiltration was also noted around small veins. Inflammatory changes were mild in the fat lobules, and fat necrosis and infiltration of lipid-laden macrophages were absent. Findings of obliterative phlebitis or arteritis were not seen. Conclusion: Isolated involvement of the omentum by a panniculitic process is rare, and the pathogenesis of eosinophilic septal panniculitis found in the present case remains unknown, but involvement of a hypersensitivity reaction against some unknown stimuli is presumed, based on the histopathological resemblance of the omental lesions to erythema nodosum or eosinophilic panniculitis of the skin. We should keep in mind the possibility that the omental lesion in this patient is a harbinger of more serious immunological disorders. Careful, long-term follow-up and monitoring of the patient are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.