Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196383›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Relationship Between Physical Activity and Visual Acuity in Japanese Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kensaku Sasayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kensaku SasayamaFaculty of Education Mie University Mie Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7474-9960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Physical activity, including outdoor activities, has been assessed using questionnaires or accelerometers. Examining the relationship between physical activity and myopia is important for future intervention studies. This study aimed to evaluate physical activity using a widely used questionnaire and an accelerometer and to examine their relationship with myopia. Methods: In Study 1, physical activity was assessed using a questionnaire in 613 primary school students (Grades 3-6, aged 8-12) and 438 secondary school students (Grades 1-3, aged 12-15). In Study 2, physical activity in 55 primary school students (Grades 3-6, aged 8-12) was measured using an accelerometer. Visual acuity was determined using Landolt ring tests. Screen time was also assessed in both studies. The relationship between physical activity (independent variable) and visual acuity (dependent variable) was analyzed using binomial logistic regression, adjusting for grade, gender, and screen time. Results: No significant association was found between visual acuity and physical activity as measured by either questionnaire or accelerometer in both primary and secondary students, even after adjustments for grade, gender, and screen time. Conclusion: Physical activity measured by questionnaires and accelerometers did not show an association with myopia. However, this does not exclude a potential association between outdoor activity and myopia. Our findings suggested that these methods of assessing physical activity may not be suitable proxies for outdoor activity in myopia research.

Indexed as

accelerometryexercisemyopiavisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID40196383
PMCPMC11973451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.