ArticleHealth science reports2025
Relationship Between Physical Activity and Visual Acuity in Japanese Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Physical activity, including outdoor activities, has been assessed using questionnaires or accelerometers. Examining the relationship between physical activity and myopia is important for future intervention studies. This study aimed to evaluate physical activity using a widely used questionnaire and an accelerometer and to examine their relationship with myopia. Methods: In Study 1, physical activity was assessed using a questionnaire in 613 primary school students (Grades 3-6, aged 8-12) and 438 secondary school students (Grades 1-3, aged 12-15). In Study 2, physical activity in 55 primary school students (Grades 3-6, aged 8-12) was measured using an accelerometer. Visual acuity was determined using Landolt ring tests. Screen time was also assessed in both studies. The relationship between physical activity (independent variable) and visual acuity (dependent variable) was analyzed using binomial logistic regression, adjusting for grade, gender, and screen time. Results: No significant association was found between visual acuity and physical activity as measured by either questionnaire or accelerometer in both primary and secondary students, even after adjustments for grade, gender, and screen time. Conclusion: Physical activity measured by questionnaires and accelerometers did not show an association with myopia. However, this does not exclude a potential association between outdoor activity and myopia. Our findings suggested that these methods of assessing physical activity may not be suitable proxies for outdoor activity in myopia research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.