SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Research progress of measuring tools for nursing students' clinical learning environment.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Learning to Leadership Development: Exploring Educational Leadership Competencies Among Undergraduate Nursing Students.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Nursing students' views and preferences regarding the Clinical Learning Environment in Morocco: A cross-sectional study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To understand the current situation and progress of clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students, this paper reviews the relevant research on clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students. Methods: Three databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI) were searched for relevant articles. Research articles that met specific criteria were included, with identified articles initially screened by title and keyword. Then the abstracts were screened for relevance, and the full text was read for validation before inclusion. Descriptive analysis was performed with relevant findings from data retrieved from various sources. Results: We included 19 articles that met the criteria, and introduced nine measurement scales, which completed the reliability and validity test through empirical research, providing an important reference for the assessment of clinical learning environment for nursing students. The Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision instrument (CLESI) has been translated into many languages and is widely used. Conclusion: This review includes multiple clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students, which have important value in evaluating the clinical environment of nursing students and can provide reference for scholars to carry out relevant research and practice. It also introduces the research prospects in this field, aiming to inspire future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.