ArticleFood science and biotechnology2025
Effects of different drying methods on the drying kinetics and quality characteristics of Orah (
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anchovy drying using step-down microwave technique.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Modeling and Optimization of Microwave Vacuum Drying for Pinelliae Rhizoma: Integrating Drying Kinetics, Artificial Neural Networks, and Quality Preservation.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of microwave vacuum drying (MVD), microwave drying (MD), heat pump drying (HPD), hot air drying (HAD), and freeze drying (FD) on the drying kinetics, and changes of physicochemical properties and bioactive compound of Orah slices. In the analysis of the seven models examined, the Page model was found to be the most accurate in describing the changes in moisture content during the drying process. MD was significantly faster than HAD and HPD, reducing drying time by 95.12 and 94.17%, respectively, and increasing the effective moisture diffusion rate by 94.40%. Microscopic analysis showed MVD samples had large, uniform pores, which improved moisture diffusion. FD and MVD preserved bioactive nutrients and demonstrated superior antioxidant activity over other methods. MVD produced products with balanced texture, minimal color change, and the shortest drying time of 38 min. MVD can be a promising dehydration technique for producing high-quality Orah products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.