ArticlePeerJ2025
Appraisal of healthcare students and professionals' knowledge and intention to educate the public regarding monkeypox (Mpox).
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In light of the increasing prevalence of monkeypox (Mpox) infections worldwide, it is critical to assess the level of awareness regarding the disease and its transmission among healthcare students and professionals. Understanding the knowledge gaps within these groups is essential, as they play a vital role in infection prevention and public education. Objectives: This study aimed to assess healthcare students and professionals' knowledge and intention to educate the public regarding Mpox. Methods: An anonymous survey consisting of 37 items was constructed utilizing scientific information pertaining to Mpox, obtained from sources such as the World Health Organization (WHO), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and previous studies. The study sample comprised healthcare professionals and students who were residents of the Al-Jouf province in Saudi Arabia. Significant associations between sociodemographic data and the knowledge and intention to educate the public about Mpox were compared using statistical methods. The comparison of means for two or more than two groups were performed using Student Results: Out of 545 responses, 437 (80.2%) were incorporated into the final analysis. Almost half of the participants in the study were female (51.5%) and 44.2% fell within the age range of 20 to 25 years. Moreover, 49.7% of the participants were unmarried and 29.5% held a bachelor's degree. Over seven in ten participants were cognizant of the fact that Mpox is a public health emergency of international concern, whereas less than half of the participants were cognizant of the fact that Mpox has been reported in Saudi Arabia. The overall mean knowledge score was 10.40 ± 4.88 (score range: 0 to 21). Approximately 3.9% of the participants possess excellent knowledge (score > 17) and 44.9% possess average knowledge (score 12-17). The male gender, older participants, married, healthcare professionals and those in the medicine field were more knowledgeable. More than half of the study participants are willing to educate the public regarding Mpox, where overall intention score was 21.39 ± 6.84 (range 6 to 30). The female, married and those in the physiotherapy field showed more positive attitude and intention to educate the public regarding Mpox. Conclusions: Despite the fact that the majority of participants had a high or moderate intention to educate the public about Mpox, their knowledge ranged from average to poor. In light of these findings, educational programs aimed at enhancing the knowledge and awareness of healthcare professionals and students regarding Mpox are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.