ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Contamination rates in serially sampled sputum specimens obtained during tuberculosis treatment to capture culture conversion.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sputum cultures are the gold standard for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis and treatment monitoring. However, cultures in MGIT liquid media are susceptible to microbial contamination, often rendering them uninterpretable. Research has shown that maintaining strict cold chains and supervised sample collection can reduce contamination rates, but few longitudinal studies with weekly sampling have explored this. Here we evaluated whether (1) the time between specimen collection and laboratory processing and (2) unsupervised specimen collection are associated with contamination rates. Additionally, we estimated contamination rates over the first 12 weeks of treatment and assessed clinical and behavioral predictors of contamination. We collected 3155 sputum specimens from 301 participants undergoing TB treatment. Contamination was lowest (12.3%) at treatment initiation, increased over the first few weeks, and stabilized around 30% from week 8 onwards. Samples collected without supervision were more likely to be contaminated at treatment initiation (p=0.048) and over the 12 weeks (p=0.028). We observed an inverse relationship between smear grade and contamination risk throughout the sampling period. These findings underscore the importance of supervised sputum collection to reduce contamination and provide ways to enhance the clinical and research value of weekly cultures, particularly those collected later in treatment. This is especially relevant for community-collected specimens used in monitoring treatment response.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.