ArticleBMJ oncology2025
Supercharged NK cells, unlike primary activated NK cells, effectively target ovarian cancer cells irrespective of MHC-class I expression.
Article in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Role of Probiotics in Enhancing Immune Function and Improving the Effectiveness of Treatments for Pancreatic Cancer.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Supercharged NK cells: a unique population of NK cells capable of differentiating stem cells and lysis of MHC class I high differentiated tumors.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Souped-up natural killer (NK) cells for treating tough cancers.BMJ oncology · 2025Article
- Extending the functional lifespan of natural killer (NK) cells: towards durable cytotoxicity in NK-cell based immunotherapy.BMJ oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate the significance of supercharged natural killer (sNK) cells to target aggressive gynecological tumours. Methods and analysis: We used cell cultures of peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and purified NK cells alone and in the presence of tumours. MHC-class gene expression assessments of ovarian tumours were performed using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Secretion and expression levels of cytokines in PBMCs and NK cells were determined using ELISA and scRNA seq analysis, respectively. A flow cytometer was used for surface marker analysis. Results: We have observed a significant decrease in the numbers and functions of NK cells in patients with ovarian cancer. GSEA revealed differently expressed genes, decreased differentiation- and immune-related genes, and increased genes for cell cycle analysis in recurrent tumours compared with chemo-naive ovarian tumours. Increased gene expression as well as secretion of interferon-γ and tumour necrosis factor-α and increased avidity in binding to tumour cells by sNK cells was observed. Unlike primary interleukin (IL)-2-activated NK cells, sNK cells effectively lysed OVCAR8 ovarian poorly differentiated cancer stem-like cells (PDCSCs) and well-differentiated OVCAR4 tumours. Primary ovarian tumours with lower MHC-class I expression were highly susceptible to both primary IL-2-activated NK and sNK cells, whereas the well-differentiated tumours with high expression of MHC-class I were only susceptible to sNK cells. Conclusion: The use of sNK cells in immunotherapy emerges as a potentially effective strategy to target and eliminate the majority of ovarian tumour clones, thereby providing a potential therapeutic opportunity in preventing the recurrence of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.