Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196205›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Inter-limb and inter-agent coordination in an original joint-action game: exploring novel approaches for clinical practice.

Anaëlle Cheillan, João Milho, Pedro Passos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anaëlle CheillanFaculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
João Milho *IDMEC, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pedro Passos *CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After identifying a need to develop rehabilitation practices inspired from a systems perspective, we designed a joint-action game that involves both inter-limb and inter-agent coordination. The main specificity of our joint-action game lies in the informational and mechanical couplings that exist between the system elements-i.e., between lower limbs at one scale, and between agents at another scale. The present paper aims to investigate whether our joint-action game can foster the emergence of new coordination patterns at both scales, and discuss whether such patterns, if any, could be clinically relevant. Twelve dyads were asked to stand up on an unstable surface (BOSU) and to jointly manipulate a board on which a ball had to roll along a circular path containing target doors. Ball trajectory as well as lower limb and hand kinematics were obtained using an 8-camera motion capture system. Coordination between left and right knee joint angles was assessed through relative-phase and PCA analyses. Inter-agent coordination was evaluated using UCM analyses. The effects of amount of practice and performance on coordination were investigated. At both scales, significant coordination differences were found over practice and across levels of performance. More specifically, left and right knees were constrained to act as a single unit, while interpersonal synergies were observed in trials with better performance. We discussed how the exploration of coordinative solutions, as well as the dimensional reduction and reciprocal compensation among degrees of freedom that our game supports could be beneficially exploited in rehabilitation.

Indexed as

complex systemsdegrees of freedomdimensional reductioninterpersonal synergymotor explorationprincipal componentreciprocal compensationuncontrolled manifold

Identifiers

PMID40196205
PMCPMC11973364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.