Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196147›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Cancer Vaccine Adjuvant Name Recognition from Biomedical Literature using Large Language Models.

Hasin Rehana, Jie Zheng, Leo Yeh, Benu Bansal, Nur Bengisu Çam, Christianah Jemiyo, Brett McGregor, Arzucan Özgür, Yongqun He, Junguk Hur

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hasin RehanaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58202, USA.
Jie ZhengUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Leo YehUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Benu BansalSchool of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58202, USA.
Nur Bengisu ÇamDepartment of Computer Engineering, Bogazici University, 34342 Istanbul, Turkey.
Christianah JemiyoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58202, USA.
Brett McGregorDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58202, USA.
Arzucan ÖzgürDepartment of Computer Engineering, Bogazici University, 34342 Istanbul, Turkey.
Yongqun HeUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Junguk HurDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58202, USA.

Funding

VIOLIN 2.0: Vaccine Information and Ontology LInked kNowledgebaseU24AI171008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Yongqun He, Junguk Hur · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI171008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: An adjuvant is a chemical incorporated into vaccines that enhances their efficacy by improving the immune response. Identifying adjuvant names from cancer vaccine studies is essential for furthering research and enhancing immunotherapies. However, the manual curation from the constantly expanding biomedical literature poses significant challenges. This study explores the automated recognition of vaccine adjuvant names using state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT) and Large Language Model Meta AI (Llama). Methods: We utilized two datasets: 97 clinical trial records from AdjuvareDB and 290 PubMed abstracts annotated with the Vaccine Adjuvant Compendium (VAC). Two LLMs, GPT-4o and Llama 3.2 were employed in zero-shot and few-shot learning paradigms with up to four examples per prompt. Prompts explicitly targeted adjuvant names, testing the impact of contextual information such as substances or interventions. Outputs underwent automated and manual validation for accuracy and consistency. Results: GPT-4o consistently attained 100% Precision across all situations, while also exhibiting notable enhancements in Recall and F1-scores, particularly with the incorporation of interventions. On the VAC dataset, GPT-4o achieved a maximum F1-score of 77.32% with interventions, surpassing Llama-3.2-3B by approximately 2%. On the AdjuvareDB dataset, GPT-4o reached an F1-score of 81.67% for three-shot prompting with interventions, surpassing Llama-3.2-3B's maximum F1-score of 65.62%. These results highlight the critical role of contextual information in enhancing model performance, with GPT-4o demonstrating a superior ability to leverage this enrichment. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that LLMs excel at accurately identifying adjuvant names, including rare and novel variations of naming representation. This study emphasizes the capability of LLMs to enhance cancer vaccine development by efficiently extracting insights from clinical trial data. Future work aims to broaden the framework to encompass a wider array of biomedical literature and enhance model generalizability across various vaccines and adjuvants. Availability: Source code is available at https://github.com/hurlab/Vaccine-Adjuvant-LLM.

Identifiers

PMID40196147
PMCPMC11975310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.