ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Association of visceral fat metabolism score with risk of rheumatoid arthritis in US adults.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Nonlinear relationship between body roundness index and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in American adults.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Visceral Adiposity Index (METS-VF) has emerged as a novel obesity assessment metric. However, research exploring the relationship between METS-VF and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains limited. The objective of this investigation was to examine the correlation between the prevalence of RA and METS-VF. Methods: The NHANES data collected between 2011 and 2018 were used in this investigation. To determine the association between METS-VF and the prevalence of RA, logistic regression analysis was used. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis were done to test how reliable the results were. Finally, the predictive power of BMI, waist circumference, and METS-VF for RA was compared using ROC curve analysis. Results: This research had 8,626 individuals in total. The findings showed that compared to those without RA, persons with the condition had noticeably greater METS-VF levels. METS-VF and the prevalence of RA were significantly positively correlated, according to a logistic regression analysis (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.12-2.00). The results of the sensitivity and subgroup analyses agreed with the primary conclusions. ROC analysis indicated that METS-VF possessed a superior ability to predict RA compared to BMI and waist circumference. Conclusion: This study indicates that elevated METS-VF levels are positively correlated with an increased risk of RA in the US population. Monitoring this metric might aid in the early detection of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.