ArticleResearch square2025
Opportunities and challenges of integrating digital health into medical education curricula: A scoping review.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The global strategy for digital health advocates digital health literacy in formal education and training curricula for all health professionals. However, little is known about the opportunities and challenges of integrating digital health into medical training curricula. Methods: Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology, we searched the PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect scholarly databases for peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024. Data extraction was guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research. Results: Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The opportunities identified include the need for healthcare digitalization, reshaping the future daily work of healthcare professionals, decreasing students' doubts about digital health and increasing the quality of patients' care. On the other hand, a lack of infrastructure and educational materials, the dense nature of the existing curriculum, and bureaucratic tendencies were identified as challenges. The provision of consolidated funds and the establishment of dedicated digital health infrastructure, starting with elective and audited modular approaches, raising awareness, and educating stakeholders, emerged as implementation strategies for mitigating these challenges. Conclusion: Global progress toward integrating digital health literacy in formal medical training curricula remains slow. There is a need for concerted efforts and political commitment to offer guidance and moral and financial support for this integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.