ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Digital screen time usage, prevalence of excessive digital screen time, and its association with mental health, sleep quality, and academic performance among Southern University students.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of sleep disturbance among chinese college students: an updated meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Fatigue and Cognitive Load in E-Learning: Evidence From Nursing Students in Jordan.Nursing open · 2026Observational
- Knowledge, attitude, practice and symptoms of computer vision syndrome: a comparative study among university students and support staff.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Interplay of academic stress, digital fatigue, and loneliness in predicting university students' mental health in the post-COVID era.Discover mental health · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Factors Associated with Poor Sleep Quality Among Undergraduate Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Longitudinal effects of technostress on bedtime procrastination and sleep quality among university students.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Screen Time Patterns and Their Impact on Academic Performance: A Prospective Study Among Phase 1 MBBS Students.Cureus · 2026Article
- Gendered Social Construction of Adolescent Health Practices Through Digital Detox and Physical Activity.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Is martial arts participation associated with sleep quality among Chinese adolescents? A cross-sectional baseline survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Screen time and chronic neck pain in Peru: A comparative population-based cross-sectional study in the COVID-19 post-pandemic period.PloS one · 2026Article
- Rethinking Digital Mental Health: From Nomophobia to Neurocognitive Exhaustion in LMIC Youth.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Translation and Preliminary Validation of the Computer Vision Syndrome Scale-17 (CVSS-17) into Arabic: A Pilot Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Smartphone usage in young adults: cross-sectional associations with physical activity, sleep, social isolation, academic achievement, and anxiety.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Excessive digital screen time (EDST), which is defined as screen use that surpasses recommended limits, has been found to have detrimental effects on students' mental health and academic performance. However, there is a paucity of studies investigating EDST in university students in Thailand. Objective: To investigate the prevalence, characteristics, and associations of excessive digital screen time with students' mental health, sleep quality, and academic performance. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Southern University, Thailand, between December 2023 and January 2024. A total of 446 students completed self-administered questionnaires assessing DST characteristics, mental health, sleep quality, and academic performance. The tools used included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. DST was analyzed by device type and average weekly usage hours, focusing on smartphones, tablets, and computers. EDST was defined as daily usage exceeding 8 hours for smartphones, 6 hours for tablets, or 5 hours for computers. Participants exceeding these thresholds on any device were classified as having EDST. Sampling was conducted using quota sampling across faculties. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests, rank sum tests, and logistic regression, with significance set at P<0.05. Results: Students' median age was 20 years (67.9% women). Most participants used smartphones for 4-6 hours daily (29.7%), tablets for <4 hours (29.8%), and computers for <4 hours (62.6%). Smartphones were primarily used for social media (73.1%), while tablets (28.4%) and computers (19.3%) were used for educational purposes. The prevalence of EDST was 48.4%, including 29.4% on tablets, 22.9% on smartphones, and 7.6% on computers. EDST was significantly associated with younger age (AOR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94) and enrollment in health science faculties (AOR 1.7; 95% CI 1.01-2.86). Conclusion: A high prevalence of EDST was observed among university students, particularly on smartphones and tablets. Younger students and those in health science programs were more prone to EDST, potentially due to higher academic demands and social media use. Interventions to enhance self-awareness, regulate screen time, and develop time management skills are recommended to mitigate its negative effects on mental health and academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.