Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195933›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2025

Using citizen science photographs to identify reproductive events in an oviparous elasmobranch.

Rachel Mawer, Jane Dodd, James Thorburn, Neil M Burns, David M Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel MawerNatureScot, Oban, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0114-9691
Jane DoddNatureScot, Oban, UK.
James ThorburnEdinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Neil M BurnsUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
David M BaileyUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

NatureScot
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying critical habitats is important for the effective management of vulnerable species. Critical habitats, such as mating or nursery grounds, support populations during key life stages and help to maximise reproductive output and population growth. In elasmobranchs, mating often happens over a defined season, suggesting sites associated with this process may only require temporal protection. However, knowledge gaps on such sites exist for many elasmobranchs due to the challenges associated with identifying temporal mating periods, which hinders conservation efforts. Here, we investigated the application of photographs to estimate reproductive timing in an oviparous elasmobranch, the flapper skate (Dipturus intermedius), as a non-invasive and low-cost alternative to other approaches. Using a pre-existing citizen science photo-ID database of over 2000 images, we identified signs of reproductive behaviour: the presence or absence of pelvic swelling, bite wounds and scratch wounds. Statistical models were created for each feature to explore seasonal trends and other parameters explaining their presence. Seasonal trends were present for all features and feature occurrence differed with sex. The occurrence of bite wounds and pelvic swelling in flapper skate peaked over winter and spring months, suggesting a winter-spring mating and egg-laying period. These results are corroborated by previous reproductive research on the flapper skate, suggesting the applied method is a valid tool to estimate reproductive timing in an elusive elasmobranch. The approach could be applied to other flapper skate populations and other elasmobranch species, helping to close existing knowledge gaps on reproductive behaviours.

Indexed as

Citizen SciencePhotographyReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalSkates, FishAnimalsFemaleMaleOviparitySeasonscitizen sciencecritical habitatsflapper skateRajidaereproductive cycle

Identifiers

PMID40195933
PMCPMC12360143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.