Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195665›Full record

ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2024

Value of spinal high temporal/high spatial resolution CE-MRA in the diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Yihang Su, Jilin Nie, Bin Chen, Shuai Yang, Changyong Chen, Weihua Liao, Qing Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yihang SuDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China. suyihang159@163.com.
Jilin NieDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Bin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Shuai YangDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Changyong ChenDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Weihua LiaoDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Qing ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China. zq570153364@foxmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDigital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the current gold standard for diagnosing spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF). However, DSA is invasive and associated with risks such as ionizing radiation and iodine contrast allergy. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) with high temporal/high spatial resolution allows dynamic multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging with excellent detail. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of spinal CE-MRA with high temporal/high spatial resolution for SDAVF.

methodsClinical data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent both conventional spinal MRI and high temporal/high spatial resolution CE-MRA at Xiangya Hospital between January 1, 2021, and January 1, 2024, and who subsequently underwent DSA or surgery within 90 days. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed all conventional MRI and CE-MRA images. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional MRI and CE-MRA for diagnosing SDAVF were calculated against the gold standard DSA findings. Kappa statistics were used to evaluate the consistency of MRI and CE-MRA compared to DSA. The diagnostic value was further assessed by calculating the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

resultsA total of 60 patients were included, of whom 47 were diagnosed with SDAVF and 13 were not. Conventional MRI had 3 false negatives and 1 false positive; CE-MRA had 2 false positives and 0 false negative. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional MRI were 93.62% and 92.31%, respectively. CE-MRA demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 84.62% specificity. The main cause of false positives was the misidentification of posterior spinal arteries as feeding arteries. CE-MRA clearly displayed most feeding arteries, and the accuracy of fistula localization was 74.47% (35/47). Kappa values for conventional MRI and CE-MRA were 0.814 and 0.896, respectively (both

conclusionsSpinal CE-MRA with high temporal/high spatial resolution is a reliable, non-invasive imaging technique with high sensitivity for diagnosing SDAVF. It can clearly visualize feeding arteries and provides valuable preoperative diagnostic and localization information to support DSA or surgical planning.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System Vascular MalformationsMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAdultAgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Mediacontrast- enhanced magnetic resonance angiographydigital subtraction angiographyfeeding arterieshigh temporal/high spatial resolutionmagnetic resonance imagingsensitivityspinal dural arteriovenous fistulas

Identifiers

PMID40195665
PMCPMC11975516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.