Observational studyClinical endocrinology2025
Is It Possible to Screen for Primary Aldosteronism Effectively in Primary Care?
Observational study in Clinical endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrimary aldosteronism (PA) is the commonest secondary cause of hypertension but case-detection remains a challenge. Screening is usually performed in secondary care using an aldosterone:renin ratio (ARR) measurement. Here, we describe the outcomes of screening in primary care, in Oxfordshire, UK.
designRetrospective observational study. PATIENTS: Adults screened for PA in primary care services in Oxford between 2008 and 2022. MEASUREMENTS: ARR test results in primary care and outcomes of secondary care evaluation (ARR, saline infusion test, final diagnosis). Primary care and secondary care ARR tests were compared for correlation, concordance and performance in predicting PA.
resultsAmong 2915 adults screened in primary care, 455 were referred to secondary care and 107 (3.7% of total population screened) were diagnosed with PA. Primary care ARR showed strong correlation with secondary care ARR (r = 0.841, p < 0.001). Area under the ROC curve to predict PA was 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.86) for primary care ARR testing. Primary care ARR cut-off of ≥ 30 pmol/mU showed comparable sensitivity (91.7% vs 92.1%, p = 0.467) to and modest concordance (Kappa 0.583, p < 0.001) with secondary care ARR. Use of beta-blockers were associated with higher risk of false positive test result (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-12.0, p = 0.042).
conclusionsScreening for PA in primary care with ARR is feasible with modest concordance and comparable sensitivity to secondary care testing. Simple referral criteria and raising awareness among primary care colleagues could ensure appropriate referral to secondary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.