Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195584›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Clinical Guidelines for Virtual Health Assessment and Care: A Scoping Review.

S Brownie, L Zarb, L Cochrane, A Bonacaro, P Broman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S BrownieSwinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7204-2451
L ZarbUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
L CochraneUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-6107
A BonacaroParma University, Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
P BromanSwinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Swinburne University of Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo locate and synthesise clinical guidelines for nurses and other health professionals undertaking routine virtual health (telehealth) assessment, triage and follow-up care. To locate practice guidelines where clinician and client are not in the same physical location and health assessments are undertaken 'virtually'.

designThis review used JBI methodology for scoping reviews and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR). DATA SOURCES: Search considered primary research, practice guidelines, case reports, expert opinions, professional organisation web-based resources and grey literature. Medline (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) and Scopus databases were searched in relation to all health professions. Grey literature search included guideline databases, literature databases, customised Google search engines, targeted websites and consultation with content experts. Citation searching was included.

resultsSearch identified 2359 peer-reviewed articles and 31 sources of grey literature (1997-2024). After screening, 22 peer-reviewed and 9 grey literature sources met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Studies were spread across diverse practice settings. Chronological sequencing provided visibility to innovations in telehealth practice over time from telephone-based practice to the introduction of video conferencing and the use of wearable devices for the transmission of remotely recorded clinical information.

conclusionsStandardised guidelines to safe practice for virtual health assessment are not well documented. The paucity of clinically orientated guidelines may be due to complexity and the resourcing needed to maintain clinically current guidelines across the full breadth of clinical specialisations, practice settings and telehealth modalities. Further research and development are needed in this growing area of care. IMPACT: The review highlights that clinically relevant guidelines are critical to safety and quality in virtual health contexts. Findings will inform future design and development of clinical practice guidelines for nurses engaged in virtual health assessment, triage and follow-up care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicTelemedicineHumansTriagehealth professionsnursingnursing processpractice guidelinestelehealthtelenursingtriagevirtual health assessment

Identifiers

PMID40195584
PMCPMC12721947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.