ArticleSociology of health & illness2025
Reconfiguring Vulnerability and Dis/Ability: An Agential Realist Exploration to Disentangle Vulnerability Effects in Austria's COVID-19 Response.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article examines how vulnerability emerged, evolved and was contested during Austria's COVID-19 response, by attending to the entangled realities of people with dis/abilities. Using a posthumanist, agential realist lens and a diffractive methodology, the research explores how vulnerability is not a fixed state but a dynamic process shaped by material and discursive practices. It introduces the concept of 'vulnerability effects' to articulate that vulnerabilities are simultaneously a product of and a catalyst for material and discursive practices within systems of dis/ability and crisis response. Drawing on Carol Thomas's distinction between disablism and impairment effects, the analysis moves beyond binary framings to capture how vulnerabilities are simultaneously produced by systemic inequalities and contested through creative acts of resistance. Through the narratives of participants navigating institutional restrictions, inaccessible environments and intersecting crises, the article illustrates how debilitating conditions and activist affordances intra-act, shaping the possibilities for agency and resilience. The findings reveal the fluid, context-dependent and performative nature of vulnerability, challenging static paradigms in crisis response. By reframing vulnerability as relational and emergent, the article calls for inclusive and response-able approaches to policy and social structures that address systemic neglect and promote equitable opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.