Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195546›Full record

ReviewInsect science2026

Genetic engineering for SIT application: a fruit fly-focused review.

Serafima Davydova, Danheng Yu, Angela Meccariello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Serafima DavydovaDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Danheng YuDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-1405
Angela MeccarielloDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-5764

Funding

European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme REACTInternational Atomic Energy Agency as part of the Coordinated Research Project Generic approach for the development of genetic sexing strains for SIT applications
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sterile insect technique (SIT) has become a key component of efficient pest control. Fruit fly pests from the Drosophilidae and Tephritidae families pose a substantial and overwhelmingly increasing threat to the agricultural industry, aggravated by climate change and globalization among other contributors. In this review, we discuss the advances in genetic engineering aimed to improve the SIT-mediated fruit fly pest control. This includes SIT enhancement strategies such as novel genetic sexing strain and female lethality approaches. Self-pervasive X-shredding and X-poisoning sex distorters, alongside gene drive varieties are also reviewed. The self-limiting precision-guided SIT, which aims to tackle female removal and male fertility via CRISPR/Cas9, is additionally introduced. By using examples of existing genetic tools in the fruit fly pests of interest, as well as model species, we illustrate that the population control intensity may be modulated depending on strategy selection.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringPest Control, BiologicalTephritidaeAnimalsFemaleMaleagricultural pestCRISPR/Cas9Drosophilidaepopulation controlTephritidae

Identifiers

PMID40195546
PMCPMC13087840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.