ArticleScientific reports2025
Speech emotion recognition with light weight deep neural ensemble model using hand crafted features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI emotion recognition from bodily gestures and vocal tone reveals modality-specific performance and positivity bias.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A spectrogram and local feature-assisted convolutional neural network for Amharic speech emotion identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimization of speech emotion recognition using hybrid dataset integration and deep learning-based feature fusion with a novel balanced focal entropy loss.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Data-centric review of multimodal emotion recognition: datasets, feature extraction, data fusion and limitations.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Review
- Hybrid CNN-embedding fusion with MFCC-SVM for speech emotion recognition: Random vs actor-wise evaluation on CREMA-D.PloS one · 2026Article
- Advanced feature selection and temporal attention mechanisms with Bi-LSTM classifier for optimizing emotion recognition in Kashmiri speech.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- SBT-Net: a tri-cue guided multimodal fusion framework for depression recognition.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Bridging Text and Speech for Emotion Understanding: An Explainable Multimodal Transformer Fusion Framework with Unified Audio-Text Attribution.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Emotion Recognition: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- RETRACTED: HGLER: A hierarchical heterogeneous graph networks for enhanced multimodal emotion recognition in conversations.PloS one · 2025Article
- Feature selection for emotion recognition in speech: a comparative study of filter and wrapper methods.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic emotion detection has become crucial in various domains, such as healthcare, neuroscience, smart home technologies, and human-computer interaction (HCI). Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) has attracted considerable attention because of its potential to improve conversational robotics and human-computer interaction (HCI) systems. Despite its promise, SER research faces challenges such as data scarcity, the subjective nature of emotions, and complex feature extraction methods. In this paper, we seek to investigate whether a lightweight deep neural ensemble model (CNN and CNN_Bi-LSTM) using well-known hand-crafted features such as ZCR, RMSE, Chroma STFT, and MFCC would outperform models that use automatic feature extraction techniques (e.g., spectrogram-based methods) on benchmarked datasets. The focus of this paper is on the effectiveness of careful fine-tuning of the neural models with learning rate (LR) schedulers and applying regularization techniques. Our proposed ensemble model is validated using five publicly available datasets: RAVDESS, TESS, SAVEE, CREMA-D, and EmoDB. Accuracy, AUC-ROC, AUC-PRC, and F1-score metrics were used for performance testing, and the LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) technique was used for interpreting the results of our proposed ensemble model. Results indicate that our ensemble model consistently outperforms individual models, as well as several compared models which include spectrogram-based models for the above datasets in terms of the evaluation metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.