ArticleScientific reports2025
Physiological assessment of the psychological flow state using wearable devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Warming Up Body and Mind: Combined Cognitive and Exercise Priming Improves 1-Mile Time Trial Performance in Recreational Runners.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Theta oscillations are associated with movement during choreographed and improvised dance - a case series with Memphis Jookin': The Show.Research square · 2026Article
- Effects of wearable technology on mental engagement and physical activity participation: self-regulatory motivation, attitude, flow, and dropout in new sport participation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Contribution of flow state to the discrepancy between perceived exercise intensity and physiological intensity during endurance bike exercise.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flow is the state of optimal experience which can lead to outstanding performance. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of detecting and monitoring flow using wearable devices. Twenty-eight Hungarian adults participated in the experiment. They played a game at different levels to induce flow and anti-flow states, which was tested with questionnaires. We measured electroencephalography (EEG), heart rate (HR), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) and galvanic skin response (GSR) signals as well as head and hand motion. We isolated EEG delta, theta, alpha and beta band power, HR, SpO2 and GSR average and standard deviation, as well as acceleration and angular velocity standard deviation. In flow condition, alpha and theta power were the dominant components, in accordance with the transient hypofrontality hypothesis. We also replicated the U-shaped characteristic of the heart rate variability; in addition, we propose an inverse U-shaped and a U-shaped characteristic for SpO2 and SpO2 variability, respectively. On the basis of motion tracking, subjects were the least physically active in flow, signifying a focused state, and the most active in boredom. Our results support the applicability of lightweight, wearable devices for monitoring mental state that can be utilized to improve well-being at work or in everyday situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.