ArticleScientific reports2025
Determination of the Median Effective Dose of Ciprofol Combined with Sufentanil in Inhibiting Tracheal Intubation Response in Female Patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ECDrug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Alone versus Ciprofol with Fentanyl for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Determination of ED50 and ED95 for Ciprofol in Morbidly Obese Patients During Induction of General Anesthesia: A Single-Center, Up-and-Down Study Based on Lean Body Weight.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine the median effective dose (ED50) and the 95% effective dose (ED95) of ciprofol combined with sufentanil for inhibiting the tracheal intubation response in female patients and to evaluate the hemodynamic stability and adverse events associated with this drug combination. This was a prospective dose-finding study using an up-and-down sequential allocation method. A total of 30 female patients undergoing general anesthesia surgeries between November 2024 and December 2024 were enrolled. Patients were administered ciprofol for induction, with an initial dose of 0.4 mg/kg and subsequent doses adjusted based on the presence or absence of an intubation response. The primary outcome was the ED50 of ciprofol, with secondary outcomes including patient baseline characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events. The ED50 and ED95 of ciprofol for inhibiting tracheal intubation response were 0.318 mg/kg and 0.496 mg/kg, respectively. Patients with a positive tracheal intubation response had significantly higher heart rates and mean arterial pressures, as well as a higher incidence of hypertension and body movement. The ED50 and ED95 of ciprofol combined with sufentanil for suppressing the response to tracheal intubation in female patients were 0.318 mg/kg and 0.496 mg/kg, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.