ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of the long RR intervals using convolutional neural networks in single-lead long-term Holter electrocardiogram recordings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in medical technology have extended long-term electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring from the traditional 24 h to 7-14 days, significantly enriching ECG data. However, this poses unprecedented challenges for physicians in analyzing these extensive datasets. While artificial neural networks have shown great potential in the automatic recognition of arrhythmias and are gradually being adopted widely, their effectiveness still requires rigorous evaluation in clinical applications. Although there have been many research on the evaluation of atrial fibrillation recognition performance, systematic evaluation of automatic detection algorithms for prolonged RR interval(RRI) remains lacking. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate these algorithms based on convolutional neural networks (CNN). We collected 480 single-lead long-term dynamic ECG records from our hospital, all from patients with prolonged RRI. Both CNN algorithms and manual analysis methods were used to analyze the ECGs, with manual analysis serving as the gold standard for performance evaluation. Results indicated that the CNN algorithm achieved an average recall rate of 98.41%, an average precision of 98.68%, and an average F1 score of 98.54%. These metrics demonstrate that CNN algorithms can meet the clinical demands for recognizing prolonged RRI, thereby enhancing physicians' confidence, especially when dealing with large volumes of RRI data. AI provides invaluable support for quantitative analysis and significantly improves diagnostic efficiency. This evaluation offers a reliable basis for deploying single-lead intelligent monitoring devices in households, communities, nursing homes, and other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.