ArticleScientific reports2025
Caper bush (Capparis spinosa L.) bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity as affected by adaptation to harsh soils.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytochemical Composition and Bioactivity ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Caper Bush (Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caper bush (Capparis spinosa) is a naturally grown species in different soils. To gain insight into the impact of various soil conditions on nutritional and phytochemical properties, aerial parts of caper bush (C. spinosa) were collected from gypsum and non-gypsum soils in southern Iran. Colorimetric analyses of antioxidant compounds (total phenolics and flavonoids) and antioxidant capacity tests (DPPH, FRAP, ABTS) were carried out, and intact aliphatic and indolic glucosinolates (predominant aliphatic glucocapparin) were analyzed by HPLC-DAD method. Based on the findings, plant parts and sites significantly impacted most parameters. The highest TPC values were observed in the petals in gypsum soil and the lowest in the non-gypsum soil seeds by 2317.78 and 635.06 mg/kg FW, respectively. Likewise, the highest TFC was recorded in the non-gypsum soil leaves and the lowest in the non-gypsum soil seeds by 401.06 and 55.61 Qu mg/kg FW, respectively. The highest and lowest FRAP values were observed in the leaves in gypsum (0.94) and the pistils in gypsum soil (0.80), respectively. Regarding ABTS values, the flags in the non-gypsum and gypsum sites showed the highest and lowest values of 89.51 and 78.40%, respectively. High DPPH values were recorded for most parts. The highest amount of glucocapparin was found in the pistils in gypsum, and the lowest was in the petals in gypsum soil by 35.81 and 21.65 µmol/g DW, respectively. The gypsum sites showed higher values for most of the studied parameters. The PCA results showed that pistils were associated with glucocapparin, petals with DPPH, and the leaves and sepals with TPC, FRAP, ABTS, and TFC. The majority of studied factors correlated well with TPC. Our results supported the potential of caper bush (C. spinosa) as a underexploited food rich in bioactivephytochemicals adapted to harsh soil conditions, with the potential for implementation in agroecosystems with adverse environmental conditions with the potential of better adaptation for securing the access to plant-derived foods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.