Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195386›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Learner stimulus intent: a framework for eye tracking data collection and feature extraction in computer programming education.

K R Chandrika, J Amudha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K R ChandrikaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Bengaluru, India. kr_chandrika@blr.amrita.edu.
J AmudhaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Bengaluru, India. j_amudha@blr.amrita.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye tracking technology offers valuable insights into the cognitive processes of learners in computer programming education. This research presents a novel framework called the Learner Stimulus Intent that offers useful insights into learners' cognitive processes in computer programming education and has significant implications for assessment in computer science education. The comprehensive data collection, extraction of eye gaze and semantic features, and effective visualization techniques can be utilized to evaluate students' understanding and engagement, offering a more nuanced and detailed picture of their learning progress than traditional assessment methods. Furthermore, the four distinct datasets generated by the framework each offers unique perspectives on learner behavior and their cognitive traits. These datasets are outcomes of the framework's application, embodying its potential to revolutionize the way we understand and assess learning in computer science education. By utilizing this framework, educators and researchers can gain deeper insights into the cognitive processes of learners like cognitive workload, processing order of information, confusion in mind, attention etc, ultimately enhancing instructional strategies and improving learner outcomes.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyLearningAttentionCognitionData CollectionHumansStudentsComputer educationData collectionEye trackingFrameworkSemantic

Identifiers

PMID40195386
PMCPMC11976983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.