ArticleScientific reports2025
Learner stimulus intent: a framework for eye tracking data collection and feature extraction in computer programming education.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Emotion Perception and Gaze Sharing on Collaborative Experience and Performance in Multiplayer Games.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye tracking technology offers valuable insights into the cognitive processes of learners in computer programming education. This research presents a novel framework called the Learner Stimulus Intent that offers useful insights into learners' cognitive processes in computer programming education and has significant implications for assessment in computer science education. The comprehensive data collection, extraction of eye gaze and semantic features, and effective visualization techniques can be utilized to evaluate students' understanding and engagement, offering a more nuanced and detailed picture of their learning progress than traditional assessment methods. Furthermore, the four distinct datasets generated by the framework each offers unique perspectives on learner behavior and their cognitive traits. These datasets are outcomes of the framework's application, embodying its potential to revolutionize the way we understand and assess learning in computer science education. By utilizing this framework, educators and researchers can gain deeper insights into the cognitive processes of learners like cognitive workload, processing order of information, confusion in mind, attention etc, ultimately enhancing instructional strategies and improving learner outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.