ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on tugboat scheduling optimization model considering the reliability of tugboat matching scheme.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The selection and scheduling of tugboat matching schemes are key tasks in tugboat assistance operation management. With large ships requiring more tugboat assistance, a two-stage multi-criteria decision-making method is proposed. This includes a normal distribution-based multi-attribute group decision-making method with triangular fuzzy numbers to determine tugboat matching scheme reliability. A tugboat scheduling planning model for multiple berthing bases is then established, targeting the minimization of total fuel cost and total matching scheme reliability. This bi-objective problem is solved using the posteriori method, with actual data from Nansha Port validating the proposed method. Meanwhile, a priority-based encoding Memetic algorithm is designed to address the characteristics of the problem, and the solution results for 25 test cases generated from the actual data range of the Guangzhou Port are compared and analyzed using CPLEX, genetic algorithms, and simulated annealing algorithms. The results verify the feasibility of the proposed priority-based encoding Memetic algorithm. The enhanced multi-attribute group decision-making method helps decision-makers quickly select suitable matching schemes and optimize tugboat scheduling, demonstrating effective reliability evaluation and planning optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.