ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving an endangered marine species distribution using reliable and localized environmental DNA detections combined with trawl captures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The description of marine fish distributions generally relies on trawl survey observations. For rare species, sporadic catches necessitate the combination of multiannual trawl surveys to accurately describe the distribution, limiting short term monitoring. Recent studies suggest that combining traditional capture methods and environmental DNA (eDNA) detections enhance rare species' occurrence. In this study, the reliability and localization of eDNA detections (single- and multi-species) of an endangered marine species, the Atlantic wolffish Anarhichas lupus, was assessed during fine scale surveys. eDNA was detected at all six stations sampled with Niskin bottles over caves housing one or two A. lupus. Detections from samples collected with syringes by divers along a 15 m transect perpendicular to each cave were limited to the fish cave entrance. Trawl-captures and eDNA detections were then combined to test if the species distribution is improved for broad scale surveys. The station-based frequency of species occurrence was 13% with trawl captures and increased to 23% when combined with eDNA detections. Single-species detections were generally more sensitive than multi-species detections. Our results showed that a rare marine species distribution improves combining traditional methods and eDNA detections in oceanographic surveys. Strategies for integrating optimal eDNA detections in marine surveys are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.