ArticleScientific reports2025
Longitudinal analysis of the association between parity, mode of delivery and urinary incontinence in midlife using the SWAN cohort data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urinary Incontinence's Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Quality of Life Impact on Working Women in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Urinary Incontinence and Its Relationship with Obstetric, Age, and Ethnic Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parity increases the risk of urinary incontinence, but this risk differs by mode of delivery. This study evaluated the association between mode of delivery and prevalence of urge, stress, and mixed urinary incontinence in middle age. The association between mode of delivery and urinary incontinence subtypes was examined using data from the SWAN cohort. Women who experienced vaginal, cesarean, or combination deliveries were compared against nulliparous women. Women who delivered vaginally had a significantly higher prevalence of all subtypes of incontinence compared to women who were nulliparous or delivered via other modes. No significant differences in urinary incontinence were observed when comparing women who birthed vaginally, via cesarean, or combination to nulliparous women. However, in comparison to those who delivered via cesarean, women who delivered vaginally have significantly increased odds of experiencing stress urinary incontinence, and those who delivered via combination have significantly increased odds of experiencing mixed urinary incontinence. Urge urinary incontinence appears to be driven by aging, not childbearing. Compared to cesarean, vaginal deliveries increase the odds of stress and mixed urinary incontinence during middle age. Delivering via a combination of vaginal and cesarean sections increases the odds of mixed urinary incontinence during middle age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.