Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195266›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Investigating Person-Centred Care Planning in Care Homes Across England: An Exploratory Study of Practices and Contextual Factors.

Jacqueline Damant, Yuri Hamashima, Madalina Toma, Nick Smith, Jonathan Taylor, Thais Caprioli, Sarah Jasim, Laura Prato, Hugh Mcleod, Clarissa Giebel and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Promoting Family/Friend Involvement in Care Planning in Care Homes: A Qualitative Exploration of the Usefulness and Relevance of an Information Resource.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Developing a Set of Key Principles for Care Planning Within Older Adult Care Homes: A Modified Delphi Survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jacqueline DamantCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-272X
Yuri HamashimaBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2618-9617
Madalina TomaPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3383-1187
Nick SmithPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-6988
Jonathan TaylorNuffield Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-7699
Thais CaprioliInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-0569
Sarah JasimCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3940-6350
Laura PratoInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9094-968X
Hugh McleodBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2266-7303
Clarissa GiebelInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-0566
Michele PetersNuffield Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0076-5981
Anna Ferguson MontagueIndependent Patient, Carer and Public Involvement and Engagement advisors.
Lynne WrightIndependent Patient, Carer and Public Involvement and Engagement advisors.
Martin KnappCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-0215
Anne-Marie TowersThe Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) National Priorities Programme for Adult Social Care and Social Work 201892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo report how person-centred care principles are applied to care planning and to explore the contextual factors affecting their implementation in older adult care homes in England.

designA combined framework analysis and quantitative content analysis study.

methodsUsing a semi-structured questionnaire, we interviewed 22 care home managers in England, exploring topics around care planning processes. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed through a combined framework approach and content analysis.

resultsMost care home managers discussed person-centred care planning in terms of understanding residents' values and preferences and their engagement in decision-making. Factors facilitating person-centred planning implementation included accessible planning tools, supportive care home leadership, effective communication and collaborative partnerships. Inhibiting factors included regulatory and care practice misalignment, time constraints and adverse staffing conditions.

conclusionDifferences between care home practitioners' understanding and practice of person-centred care planning require further examination to improve understanding of the sector's complexity and to develop suitable care planning instruments. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Findings demonstrate a need for improved staff access to specialised person-centred care training and an opportunity for care home nursing practitioners to lead the co-development of digital person-centred care planning tools that reflect the reality of long-term care settings. IMPACT: Identifying factors influencing the implementation of holistic approaches to care planning makes clear the need for modernising long-term care policy and practice to adapt to the contemporary challenges of the care home sector. REPORTING

methodStudy reporting was guided by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two public involvement advisors with lived experience of caring for a relative living in a care home contributed to the development of the interview guide, advised on care home engagement, guided the interpretation of the findings and commented on the drafted manuscript.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesPatient Care PlanningPatient-Centered CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesageingdementiaend of lifeholistic carelong‐term carenursing home careolder peoplepolicyqualitative approachesresidential facilities

Identifiers

PMID40195266
PMCPMC12721941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.