Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195257›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2025

Breakdown of the compositional data approach in psychometric Likert scale big data analysis: about the loss of statistical power of two-sample t-tests applied to heavy-tailed big data.

René Lehmann, Bodo Vogt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

René LehmannChair in Business Administration, esp. in Empirical Economics, and Health Economics, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany. rene1.lehmann@ovgu.de.
Bodo VogtChair in Business Administration, esp. in Empirical Economics, and Health Economics, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar psychometric scale data play a crucial role in psychological healthcare and health economics, such as in psychotherapeutic profiling and setting standards. Creating an accurate psychological profile not only benefits the patient but also saves time and costs. The quality of psychotherapeutic measures directly impacts grant funding decisions, influencing managerial choices. Moreover, the accuracy of consumer data analyses affects costs, profits, and the long-term sustainability of decisions. Considering psychometric bipolar scale data as compositional data can enhance the statistical power of well-known paired and unpaired two-sample t-tests, supporting managerial decision-making and the development or implementation of health interventions. This increase in statistical power is observed when the central limit theorem (CLT) holds true in statistics. Through stochastic simulation, this study explores the impact of violating the CLT on statistical power of the unpaired t-test under heavy-tailed data generating processes (DGPs) with finite variance. The findings reveal a reduction in statistical power based on specific parameters like the psychometric limit of quantification, the number of items in a questionnaire, the response scale used, and the dispersion of the DGP.

Identifiers

PMID40195257
PMCPMC11977074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.