Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195189›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Prevalence and risk factors for underlying vestibular weakness in cochlear implant candidates.

Allison Reeder, Rema Shah, Joseph Canner, Eric Schneider, Eugenia Vining, John F Kveton, Nofrat Schwartz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allison ReederYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. allison.reeder@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4586-600X
Rema ShahYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Joseph CannerYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Eric SchneiderYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Eugenia ViningYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
John F KvetonYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nofrat SchwartzYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Yale New Haven Hospital Yale New Haven Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the baseline vestibular function in cochlear implant candidates and identify demographic and audiologic risk factors for vestibular dysfunction. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study (2012-2022) of the CI candidate population.

settingNeurotology practice at large academic hospital.

methodsAll patients evaluated for CI underwent routine preoperative vestibular evaluation, irrespective of symptoms. Preoperative audiologic data was also analyzed.

resultsOf a total of 180 preoperative VNGs obtained, 39.4% demonstrated preoperative vestibular weakness as determined on caloric testing. Of these, 26.8% had evidence of bilateral weakness, 60.5% unilateral weakness ipsilateral to the worse hearing ear and 12.7% contralateral weakness. Demographic variables such as age, gender, BMI and medical comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia were not found to be associated with a higher risk of vestibular weakness. Patients with vestibular weakness had significantly poorer low tone hearing. Hearing loss at 250 Hz was the strongest prognostic factor for risk of vestibular weakness. Using a cutoff of 45dB at 250 Hz as an indicator for obtaining preoperative VNG was found to have a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 37.9% for identifying vestibular weakness.

conclusionsTraditional CI candidates have a high prevalence of preoperative vestibular weakness. Audiologic data and specifically severity of hearing loss in the low frequencies may be a useful indicator of vestibular weakness and thus help guide which patients should undergo preoperative VNG. We propose the cutoff point of 45dB at 250 Hz as an indicator of higher risk for vestibular weakness and recommend preoperative VNG testing for this population prior to surgery.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing LossVestibular DiseasesAdultAgedCaloric TestsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVestibular Function TestsAudiogramCochlear implantSensorineural hearing lossVestibular weaknessVideonystagmographyVNG

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.