Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Neuromuscular activation following anti-movement and dynamic core training: a randomized controlled comparative study.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trunk muscle thickness and sprint, agility, and jump performance in competitive football players.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Variation of Lower-Limb Muscle Activation Asymmetry in Step Incremental and Constant-Power Pedaling Exercise.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploratory Investigation of Motor and Psychophysiological Outcomes Following VR-Based Motor Training with Augmented Sensory Feedback for a Pilot Cohort with Spinal Cord Injury.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the effects of anti-movement and dynamic core training on neuromuscular activation in trained men using surface electromyography (sEMG).
methodsThirty-six participants were randomized into the anti-movement (AMG), traditional dynamic (TDG), or control (CG) groups in a controlled study. Training groups performed core exercises twice weekly for 6 weeks, with standardized time under tension (AMG: 30-s isometric holds; TDG: 30 s with 12 repetitions). Anterior and posterior trunk muscle activation was measured using sEMG during isometric endurance tests pre- and post-intervention.
resultsSignificant time and interaction effects were observed for lumbar erector spinae (LES) activation (F = 3.784, p = 0.029), with AMG (p = 0.016) and TDG (p = 0.004) outperforming CG. A significant enhancement in external oblique (EO; η
conclusionAnti-movement core training effectively enhances trunk muscle neuromuscular activation and efficiency, providing a robust alternative to traditional protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.