ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Prediction of moderate to severe bleeding risk in pediatric immune thrombocytopenia using machine learning.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and associated splicing patterns in neurodevelopmental disorders.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Drug-Induced and Idiosyncratic Cytopenia: The Role of AI in Prevention, Prediction, and Patient Participation.Hematology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for moderate to severe bleeding in children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Data from 286 ITP patients were prospectively collected and randomly split into training (80%) and test (20%) sets. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used for feature selection. Among seven machine learning algorithms, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated the best performance (AUC = 0.886, 95% CI: 0.790-0.982) and was selected as the optimal model. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used for model interpretation, identifying child age, age at diagnosis, and initial platelet count as key predictors of moderate to severe bleeding risk.
conclusionThe XGBoost-based prediction model shows strong predictive performance and could assist healthcare providers in identifying high-risk ITP patients, supporting appropriate clinical decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100054216, December 11, 2021 What is Known: • Current clinical practice relies solely on platelet counts to guide hospitalization and treatment in ITP children, often overlooking bleeding manifestations, leading to delayed or inappropriate treatment. Existing severe bleeding risk prediction models are primarily designed for adults and lack applicability to children. WHAT IS NEW: • This study prospectively collected data, enhancing accuracy. A novel machine learning-based prediction model was developed to assess moderate to severe bleeding risk in pediatric ITP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40195151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.