ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Radiomics-based assessment of HER2 status and prognosis in gastric cancer: a retrospective dual-center CT study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis research investigated the potential of CT-based radiomics analysis for predicting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and assessing the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC).
methods431 patients with GC from two medical centers were included in this retrospective study, with patients allocated to a training cohort (n = 221), a testing cohort (n = 94), and an external validation cohort (n = 116). Radiomics features and clinical variables associated with HER2 status were identified, and the radiomics score was subsequently derived. A radiomics model was constructed using the radiomics score, and a nomogram was developed by integrating related variables. The predictive accuracy of models was assessed via receiver operating characteristic curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) being computed. Prognostic significance was assessed by exploring the association between nomogram-predicted HER2 status and overall survival (OS).
resultsThe radiomics model yielded AUCs of 0.801, 0.793, and 0.784 for the training, testing, and external validation cohorts, respectively. A nomogram that integrated sex, CA72-4 levels, and radiomics score exhibited enhanced predictive accuracy, achieving AUCs of 0.847, 0.836, and 0.828 across the cohorts. Decision curve analysis highlighted the clinical utility of the nomogram, illustrating its ability to deliver a higher net benefit. In addition, survival analysis indicated that individuals with nomogram-predicted HER2 positivity experienced significantly shorter OS, providing robust risk stratification and prognostic insights.
conclusionThe CT-based radiomics nomogram demonstrated the ability to non-invasively predict preoperative HER2 status and stratify prognostic risk in this GC cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40195138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.