Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195131›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Immediate Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction with Fat Grafting: Preliminary Radiological, Aesthetic, and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes.

Lior Har-Shai, Tomer Lagziel, Ahuva Grubstein, Tamir Shay, Dean Ad-El, Sagit Meshulam-Derazon, Eran Sharon, Michael Icekson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lior Har-ShaiDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel. liorhs@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7468-8985
Tomer LagzielFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Ahuva GrubsteinDepartment of Imaging, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Tamir ShayDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Dean Ad-ElDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Sagit Meshulam-DerazonDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Eran SharonDepartment of Breast Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Michael IceksonDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFat grafting is a valuable tool for oncologic breast reconstruction, as it enhances aesthetic outcomes. However, concerns regarding oncologic safety and challenges in postoperative imaging have limited the adoption of immediate oncoplastic breast reconstruction (IOBR) with fat grafting. This approach can reduce the need for additional surgeries, shorten recovery time, improve aesthetics, and help mitigate the adverse effects of adjuvant radiation therapy. This study evaluates postoperative, radiological, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of immediate fat grafting in oncoplastic breast reconstruction following lumpectomy.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing IOBR with immediate fat grafting following lumpectomy (2020-2022). The plastic surgery team performed reconstruction simultaneously with lumpectomy by breast surgeons. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Breast-Q questionnaire, while expert surgeons evaluated aesthetic outcomes. Lesion characteristics, specimen weight, and postoperative radiation details were recorded. Postoperative breast imaging was reviewed for fat grafting-related abnormalities.

resultsFifteen patients were included, with 87% undergoing postoperative radiotherapy. No major complications or readmissions occurred within 30 days. Breast imaging follow-up showed 91.1% had benign post-surgical changes, while 8.9% required short-term radiologic follow-up. Post-lipoid injection findings appeared in 37.8% of cases, none with calcifications. Patient satisfaction was high (average Breast-Q Score was 74.5), with only one patient requesting additional fat grafting post-radiation. Expert assessments confirmed improved aesthetic outcomes.

conclusionIOBR with immediate fat grafting is a useful technique for lumpectomy defects across all breast quadrants, demonstrating low complication rates, high patient satisfaction, and positive aesthetic outcomes. Postoperative imaging follow-up revealed no adverse effects related to fat grafting, supporting its potential role as an additional tool in oncoplastic breast reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Adipose TissueBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyMastectomy, SegmentalPatient SatisfactionAdultEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerBreast reconstructionImmediate fat graftingOncoplastic reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID40195131
PMCPMC12423156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.