ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025
Cryoneedle Artifacts During MRI-Guided Cryoablation: Sources and Potential Mitigation Strategies.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCryoneedle artifacts are frequently observed in MRI-guided cryoablations, and may obscure visualization of critical anatomy and compromise needle placement accuracy. This work experimentally investigated the contributing factors of these artifacts to identify effective mitigation strategies. MATERIALS AND
methodsEx vivo porcine tissue with inserted cryoneedles was imaged on a 1.5-Tesla MRI. Fast spin echo (FSE) and spoiled gradient echo (GRE) sequences with echo times from 1.04 to 60 ms and specific absorption rates (SARs) from 0.01 to 2.1 W/kg were used. During MRI, cryoneedle temperatures were monitored using fiber-optic sensors. Configurations with one to three cryoneedles oriented at 0-degree or 45-degree angles to the patient table were investigated. The body coil was used for transmit/receive, both with and without an additional receive-only surface loop coil. Artifact width and intensity were measured for analysis.
resultsCryoneedle artifact widths were unrelated to echo time for both FSE (p = 0.6) and GRE (p = 0.3) and were smaller in GRE than in FSE images (p << 0.05). Artifact widths correlated with cryoneedle temperature elevations (r
conclusionClinically observed cryoneedle artifacts compromising treatment efficacy can be indicative of tissue radiofrequency heating risk, and effectively mitigated by either using GRE-based sequences or adjusting coil/cryoneedle configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40195121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.