Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195042›Full record

ReviewAdvanced biology2025

Toward Design Principles for Biomolecular Condensates for Metabolic Pathways.

Alain A M André, Nikita Rehnberg, Ankush Garg, Magnus Kjærgaard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Fusion protein condensate formation via coiled-coil domains.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alain A M AndréDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Denmar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4277-9652
Nikita RehnbergDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Denmar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4879-1280
Ankush GargDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Denmar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8369-5017
Magnus KjærgaardDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Denmar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7020-9366

Funding

Carlsbergfondet CF22-0734Novo Nordisk Fonden 0082071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biology uses membrane-less organelles or biomolecular condensates as dynamic reaction compartments that can form or dissolve to regulate biochemical pathways. This has led to a flurry of research aiming to design new synthetic organelles that function as reaction crucibles for enzymes and biomolecular cascades in biotechnology. The mechanisms by which a condensate can enhance multistep biochemical processes including mass action, tuning the chemical environment, scaffolding and metabolic channelling is reviewed. These mechanisms are not inherently beneficial for the rate of enzymatic processes but can also inhibit a reaction. Similarly, some aspects of condensates are likely intrinsically inhibitory including retardation of diffusion, where the net effect of a condensate will be a trade-off between inhibitory and stimulatory effects. It is discussed which generalizable conclusions can be drawn so far and how close it is to design principles for condensates for enzyme cascades in microbial cell factories including which reactions are likely to be enhanced by condensates and which type of condensate will be suited for which reaction.

Indexed as

Biomolecular CondensatesMetabolic Networks and PathwaysOrganellesbiomolecular condensatesenzymatic reactionsintrinsically disordered proteinssynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID40195042
PMCPMC12078866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.